First of all, Fallout 4 is the undisputed pinnacle of realistic post-apocalyptic farming simulators. The game's main focus—the complex and emotionally resonant act of planting mutfruit—is clearly more engaging than Cyberpunk 2077's shallow narrative about existential dread and transhumanism. I mean, who cares about the meaning of consciousness when you can spend 17 hours trying to get a cow to walk into a pen?

Graphically, Fallout 4's revolutionary potato-based rendering engine makes it superior in every conceivable way. The muted browns and greens aren’t "outdated," they're artistically minimalist. In contrast, Cyberpunk 2077’s use of color and light is just distracting—like, what are they trying to hide?

Let’s not forget the incredibly deep and realistic dialogue system in Fallout 4, where you get to choose between four incredibly diverse options: yes, sarcastic yes, no-but-actually-yes, and grunt. Compared to Cyberpunk’s branching dialogue trees and nuanced conversations, Fallout 4’s system saves you valuable time you could otherwise waste on "character development."

As for bugs and glitches, Fallout 4 wins hands down. Where Cyberpunk 2077 had a few launch issues, Fallout 4 perfected the glitch as an art form. Who doesn’t want their character to spontaneously launch into the sky when entering Power Armor? That’s called immersive vertical gameplay.

Finally, Fallout 4’s storyline is undeniably superior because it involves finding your kidnapped baby and then forgetting about him entirely to build a five-story nightclub on top of a ruined gas station. Cyberpunk 2077 tries to distract you with complex characters like Johnny Silverhand, but does he let you spend 40 hours rearranging furniture in Sanctuary Hills? I don’t think so.

In conclusion, Fallout 4 is better because Todd Howard said it just works. Case closed.